Moral and Ethical Considerations of Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is a new discipline that aims to use engineering principles to the creation of biological systems. Significant milestones achieved to date have enclosed the development of a written record of standardized biological components and the creation of a replicating bacterium with a chemically synthesized genome. The discipline has captured the interest of policymakers, science funders, and the media, and is setting out to attract interest from bioethicists.

Synthetic biologists aim to come up with biological organisms consistent with rational design principles. Their work might have several helpful applications; however, it conjointly raises potentially serious ethical concerns. 

Heightened ethical wrangle 

However, synthetic biologists have explored more approaches. These vary from expanding the genetic code with synthetic DNA base pairs, aggregating entire genomes from famed DNA components, re-programming stem cells into derided varieties, or self-organizing cells into organ-like 3D tissue cultures. These applications imply deep ethical discussion and public dialogue with individuals attracted by the industrial, environmental, and medical guarantees of the sphere. 

From manipulation to creationism 

Exteriorize biological development could be a crucial visionary step towards justifying its exploitation. The aspects of Machine Metaphor including Specialization, Standardization and Predictability are permitting researchers to interrupt and convene life with a transparent ethical conscience. Many synthetic biologists concentrate on the reconstruction of an organism from scratch to support a hypothesis underlying the experiment design. However, the development of recent “living machines” opens philosophical discussion concerning the life itself, and more significantly, whether humans can be creators of new forms of life or not? 

In the meanwhile, there are potential safety concerns around designed biological systems. Additionally, democratizing biology might result in new, inventive applications, but, at the same time, raises concerns relating to the deliberate misuse of emerging technologies. 

Religious views 

There have been Religious debates flowing around concerning synthetic biology because it's still a new area to be explored. However, the biologists claim that as synthetic biology becomes more flourishing this will shortly be changed. These biological creations would facilitate further cures for diseases and enhance life for the better.

Future perspective

The field of synthetic biology has expanded so fast that researchers are striving to know the philosophical nature of its approach. The aspects of Machine Metaphor conceive to compare the nitty-gritty in engineering with the genes and proteins in biology, nevertheless, this may not be a compatible illustration of nature. Which also provide a misguided image of the chaotic world of evolving organisms.

Concerns on risks and potential advantages

Very presumably, each of the potential harms and the potential advantages of synthetic biology is exaggerated in most discussions of the technology. However, synthetic biology presents some intriguing and a few very dreadful possibilities that require very careful study and observation. This process needs transparency concerning the research and interdisciplinary among those engaged to evaluate it; it ought to begin early in the research and continue after any application, and it ought to be versatile enough to respond to changes within the technology.

Conclusion

Synthetic biologists are extremely involved with responsible research and innovation. Synthetic biologists believe that the key to the main risks can be prevented with technological solutions. In step with this view, society ought to permit the technology to proceed and even offer it some funding whereas monitoring its progress and trying to confirm that the development results in sensible outcomes. Careful observation and oversight of technology are very much needed. The adventure would be Imprudent either to declare a moratorium on synthetic biology until all risks can be determined and eased or to simply ‘let science rip,’ in spite of the possible risks.

References

https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/sites/default/files/PCSBI-Synthetic-Biology-Report-12.16.10_0.pdf

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08989621.2011.575035?src=recsys&journalCode=gacr20

Balmer and P. Martin, Synthetic Biology: Social and Ethical Challenges (Nottingham, U.K.: Institute for Science and Society, 2008).

Rathenau Instituut, Constructing Life: The World of Synthetic Biology (The Hague, The Netherlands: Rathenau Instituut, 2007).

Related articles

What are the future trends in synthetic biology?

What are the moral and ethical concerns of synthetic biology?

Using Synthetic biology to Combat Pandemics: What? Why? How?